Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
2.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 15: 525-534, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37408662

RESUMO

Introduction: Strategies to mitigate rising health-care costs are a priority for patients, employers, and health insurers. Yet gaps currently exist in whether health risk assessment can forecast medical claims costs. This study examined the ability of a health quotient (HQ) based on modifiable risk factors, age, sex, and chronic conditions to predict future medical claims spending. Methods: The study included 18,695 employees and adult dependents who participated in health assessments and were enrolled in an employer-sponsored health plan. Linear mixed effect models stratified by chronic conditions and adjusted for age and sex were utilized to evaluate the relationship between the health quotient (score of 0-100) and future medical claims spending. Results: Lower baseline health quotient was associated with higher medical claims cost over 2 years of follow up. For participants with chronic condition(s), costs were $3628 higher for those with a low health quotient (<73; N = 2673) compared to those with high health quotient (>85; N = 1045), after adjustment for age and sex (P value = 0.004). Each one-unit increase in health quotient was associated with a decrease of $154 (95% CI: 87.4, 220.3) in average yearly medical claims costs during follow up. Discussion: This study used a large employee population with 2 years of follow-up data, which provides insights that are applicable to other large employers. Results of this analysis contribute to our ability to predict health-care costs using modifiable aspects of health, objective laboratory testing and chronic condition status.

3.
Popul Health Manag ; 25(6): 753-762, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36301527

RESUMO

Rising prescription costs, poor medication adherence, and safety issues pose persistent challenges to employer-sponsored health care plans and their beneficiaries. Comprehensive medication management (CMM), a patient-centered approach to medication optimization, enriched by pharmacogenomics (PGx), has been shown to improve the efficacy and safety of pharmaceutical regimens. This has contributed to improved health care outcomes, reduced costs of treatments, better adherence, shorter durations of treatment, and fewer adverse effects from drug therapy. Despite compelling clinical and economic evidence to justify the application of CMM guided by PGx, implementation in clinical settings remains sparse; notable barriers include limited physician adoption and health insurance coverage. Ultimately, these challenges may be overcome through comprehensive programs that include clinical decision support systems and education through employer-sponsored population health management channels to the benefit of the employees, employers, health care providers, and health care systems. This article discusses benefits, considerations, and barriers of scalable PGx-enriched CMM programs in the context of self-insured employers.


Assuntos
Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados , Farmacogenética , Humanos
4.
J Occup Environ Med ; 64(12): e818-e822, 2022 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36155954

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study are to assess adoption of a pharmacogenomic-enriched comprehensive medication management program in a self-insured employer setting and to better understand medication risks that affect employees. METHODS: Employees were identified to be at high risk of medication mismanagement and were subsequently provided with a program and process to improve their health. DNA testing, a clinical decision support system, and pharmacists were used to identify medication safety and effectiveness issues and to recommend appropriate changes. RESULTS: A total of 10.6% of the invited employees enrolled in the program. Actionable recommendations were suggested by pharmacists for 85.8% of employees who completed the program, averaging 5.2 recommendations per person. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a PGx + CMM program in a self-insured employer setting is feasible, detects risks in prescription regimens, and offers opportunities to improve medication management and reduce the burden of healthcare expenses.


Assuntos
Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso , Adulto , Humanos
5.
Popul Health Manag ; 24(S1): S16-S25, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33493409

RESUMO

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is having a widespread impact on societies across the globe. As part of the effort to control transmission in the United States, many businesses either closed or instituted nonpharmaceutical control measures and allowed only essential workers on-site. During summer and fall of 2020, employers began formulating "return to work" strategies designed to mitigate the risk of transmission among employees. On a population level, several countries implemented national testing and surveillance strategies that proved effective in mitigating citizen-to-citizen transmission and contributed to suppressing COVID-19. A crucial component of many such strategies is population-based testing to identify and engage individuals with asymptomatic or presymptomatic infection, which also is relevant to return-to-work strategies. The authors describe an approach that multisite employers might use to help mitigate transmission of COVID-19 in the workplace. This approach leverages a bioinformatics platform informed by real-time PCR test data at the county and subcounty (eg, Public Use Microdata Area) level, allowing for population-based testing to be selectively targeted for employees in geographies with elevated SARS-CoV-2 positivity. A "Command Center" application integrates data from multiple sources (eg, local infection trends, employee symptom diaries, Bluetooth thermometers) in real time, which can be used to inform decisions regarding surveillance and employee self-isolation or quarantine; a mobile phone-based application provides for rapid, secure communication with employees. This overview is based on peer-reviewed literature and the early experience of a large employer with implementing bioinformatics tools to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on the workplace.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Modelos Estatísticos , Saúde Ocupacional , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Teste para COVID-19 , Biologia Computacional , Humanos , Pandemias , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos , Local de Trabalho
6.
Popul Health Manag ; 24(S1): S3-S15, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33347795

RESUMO

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has abruptly transformed the outlook of employer health benefits plans for 2020 and 2021. Containing the spread of the virus and facilitating care of those infected have quickly emerged as immediate priorities. Employers have adjusted health benefits coverage to make COVID-19 testing and treatment accessible and remove barriers to care in order to facilitate the containment of the disease. Employers also are introducing strategies focused on testing, surveillance, workplace modifications, and hygiene to keep workforces healthy and workplaces safe. This paper is intended to provide evidence-based perspectives for self-insured employers for managing population health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Such considerations include (1) return to work practices focused on mitigating the spread of COVID-19 through safety practices, testing and surveillance; and (2) anticipating the impact of COVID-19 on health benefits and costs (including adaptations in delivery of care, social and behavioral health needs, and managing interrupted care for chronic conditions).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Saúde Ocupacional , Pandemias , Saúde da População , Retorno ao Trabalho , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/economia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/terapia , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Distanciamento Físico , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Popul Health Manag ; 22(6): 547-554, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30907688

RESUMO

This case study describes the collaboration between a self-insured employee benefits team and a national health insurance provider to control costs while maintaining program quality and promoting population health. In 2015, Quest Diagnostics well exceeded the full-year expense target for their ∼60,000-life Group Health Insurance (GHI) program. Through proactive changes, physician executive leadership, health plan collaboration, disease-specific population health initiatives, and plan design, Quest GHI annual employer health care cost trend subsequently improved from a year-over-year trend of 5.7% for 2014 to 2015, to 4.6% for 2015 to 2016, to -1.0% for 2016 to 2017, and most recently, 0.3% for 2017 to 2018. The actuarial value of the GHI plan did not decline, and employee cost share also remained unchanged in 2017 and 2018 versus 2016 for the high-performance network option. There was a 3% premium increase for the Preferred Provider Organization option in 2018. A third-party analysis for full year 2017 showed Quest GHI to be 11% more efficient than the mean GHI for programs with a comparable benefit and employee contribution. Early results in 2018 show improvements in the health status of the health plan membership. This article describes an approach for self-insured employers to proactively collaborate with a health plan and pharmacy benefits manager to practice the Triple Aim of improving the patient health care experience and population health while reducing per capita health care spending.


Assuntos
Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Redução de Custos , Feminino , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/economia , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino
8.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 9 Suppl 4: S1-22, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21976013

RESUMO

Biologics are essential to oncology care. As patents for older biologics begin to expire, the United States is developing an abbreviated regulatory process for the approval of similar biologics (biosimilars), which raises important considerations for the safe and appropriate incorporation of biosimilars into clinical practice for patients with cancer. The potential for biosimilars to reduce the cost of biologics, which are often high-cost components of oncology care, was the impetus behind the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, a part of the 2010 Affordable Care Act. In March 2011, NCCN assembled a work group consisting of thought leaders from NCCN Member Institutions and other organizations, to provide guidance regarding the challenges health care providers and other key stakeholders face in incorporating biosimilars in health care practice. The work group identified challenges surrounding biosimilars, including health care provider knowledge, substitution practices, pharmacovigilance, naming and product tracking, coverage and reimbursement, use in off-label settings, and data requirements for approval.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos Biossimilares/uso terapêutico , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/economia , Medicamentos Biossimilares/efeitos adversos , Medicamentos Biossimilares/economia , Aprovação de Drogas/organização & administração , Medicamentos Genéricos/economia , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapêutico , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Estados Unidos , Organização Mundial da Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...